Well, this judgment’s been done for about a week. I guess the suspense has built to a palpable enough point that I can go ahead and post it. As per the usual, questions or comments can be directed to me via PM. Also, thought you might be interested to know that this thread stretched to a whopping 18,250 words. Without further ado, I give you your judgment:
The Whole Glory
Story: 20.5 / 30
Storytelling: 4.25 / 5
Shadowed: Without dragging on about your past, you managed to both give the reader an idea of who you were, and set the scene from the end of your last battle in one paragraph. You covered almost everything about your character’s past, from why and how he became what he is, up to his reasons for being at the tournament. You give the reader a very deep look into how Honouse thinks, and the mythology surrounding him. Your poems in your third post were exceptionally well done. The anger of the very ground around Till as he died was a very poetic and fitting touch. You always give your posts a sense of a beginning and an end, wrapping things up at the end of each post just as you get back into them at the start of the next. The ending of your last post was good, but I felt like it could’ve been better. All in all, damn well done.
Setting: 7.5 / 10
Shadowed: Your descriptions of the scene around you are both vivid, and very poetic. When describing sounds, you almost always use both the word ‘sound,’ and reference your character’s ears. Your description of the souls of all those you killed surrounding you was exceptionally awesome, and vivid in imagery, though. You don’t ever seem to lose track of the world around you, and that keeps your posts feeling very realistic. Well done.
Pacing: 8.75 / 15
Shadowed: You word things fairly eloquently, but there are occasional unnecessary words or phrases that you could frankly leave out. There are many points in your posts where you lapse into purple prose. It’s never exceptionally thick, but it’s there. There is almost no need for some of the technical terminology you use, and it really just slows your posts down more. You described your attack in your fourth post much more concisely than the others, giving the reader only the information they needed to understand what was going on, and to visualize it. Try to stick more to that level of description, lest your posts drag on.
Character: 27.25 / 35
Dialogue: 6.75 / 10
Shadowed: There was very little dialogue at all in any of your posts in this thread. That was within reason considering your character’s partner died early on, but you could’ve possibly thrown in some taunts during the battle itself. The couple of lines you did include were well done, and fit with Honouse, though.
Action: 12.25 / 15
Shadowed: The way you gutted that tiger was sheer brutality, and the imagery of it was perfect. The fact that Honouse hollowed out a tree and hid inside it is also bad-ass. You got very longwinded in describing the first attack your character made, and the subsequent personification of the sky, though. The scenes of the various gods as their elect fell were an excellent addition. You become rather verbose in describing the effects of the corrosive cloud you created with Till’s corpse, although the actual act itself was very original and unique. You describe both the how and why of what your character does, and as such all his actions seem within the realm of possibility. Honouse’s decision to allow the warrior he was fighting a blow on him just to unleash his electrical attack reinforced his conclusion that quick victories were meaningless. His challenge to the dead before him really highlighted his determination, and was just an awesome scene. I really enjoyed the action in this thread.
Persona: 8.25 / 10
Shadowed: Honouse is one of the most original and fully-developed characters I’ve seen, even if he is based in Norse mythology. His thoughts and conclusions are well explained in the narrative, and his thoughts on the meaning of the valkyrie messenger gave a little more insight into what it means to be the ‘Lawmaker.’ You go into fair detail about the relationship between Till and Honouse, and at several points use that to ironic effect. Your descriptions of how Honouse ‘sees’ are always interesting and unique. You really get into your characters head, even explaining his desire to do deeds worthy of glorious songs upon his return. He is deeply embedded in the mythology you’ve used, and his reaction to seeing everyone he’s killed standing before him was one of the few times he seemed the least bit confused or flustered. He quickly regained his analytical mind, though, and his conclusions about the nature of his opponent’s last attack were appropriate.
Writing Style: 24.75 / 30
Technique: 8 / 10
Shadowed: You can get exceptionally thick with your prose. This gives a great amount of information to the reader, but the trade-off is a bit of clarity and pacing. Your narrative voice even has some qualities reminiscent of old religious scriptures, which fits awesomely with the mythology you’ve chosen. You inevitably use some of the same wording for similar situations, like something ‘thrusting’ itself into his mind, or ‘removing’ itself from his mind, and you reuse a lot of phrases, one example being ‘beating a death tattoo upon the land.’ Still, you’ve got a fairly awesome writing style that’s heavy but somehow avoids purple prose, for the most part.
Mechanics: 8.5 / 10
Shadowed: I don’t think I noticed very many errors, although there were a couple. Given the length of some of your posts, there was less that I was expecting, however. There were really never any problems with you grammar, or anything of that sort. Most of what I saw seemed to be typos.
Clarity: 8.25 /10
Shadowed: Due to the thickness of some of your prose, it was occasionally hard to understand what you were saying. This was never due to any kind of error, though, just perhaps putting too much into one sentence. Luckily, I usually understood it the second time through, and the number of instances decreased as the thread progressed.
Wildcard: 4.5 / 5
Not only do you have an awesomely deep and developed character, but you continued and finished the fight despite your partner dropping out.
Total: 77 / 100
Shadowed receives...
650 EXP and 450 GP!
Jericho’s score will be the first, Kryos’ the second.
Penumbra Intersect
Story: 20 – 19.5 / 30
Storytelling: 3.75 – 3.5 / 5
Jericho: You mention your character’s name before even acknowledging his presence in the scene, and you mention the ‘tournament’ and ‘Cabal’ casually, as if they should be understood things. You explain the missing presence of the ‘One,’ and the effect this has on Jericho and his abilities well, though. Your flashback was both well timed, and denoted for easy understanding. The conveniently-placed stones were a nice touch that reinforced his resolve to overcome his inner shortcomings. Jericho’s calm acceptance of the end after his last-ditch effort was carelessly tossed aside really spoke a lot about his faith. You gave me a pretty good look into your character and his story, but there could’ve been a bit more.
Kyros: You reveal a lot about your character in your intro. There is an overabundance of information not essential to the progression of the story, and wading through all of it is a tiresome task, however. You do an effective job of conveying the rushed mood of a fight, from referencing the clash of weapons before even mentioning anyone moving, to shortening your sentence length. Although it definitely helped the pacing a lot considering your massive posts, it would’ve been nice to hear Kryos’ thoughts on the death of Till. It adds an interesting dynamic to the relationship between you and your partner, but I was wondering why Kryos seemed so worried about Jericho considering their earlier conversation about him ‘pulling his own weight,’ so to speak. Kryos’ has some fairly complicated thoughts and feelings as his body slowly gave in to its injuries, and that gives the reader one last glance into his mind; perhaps the deepest of all your posts in the thread.
Setting: 7 – 7.5 / 10
Jericho: Your style seems to favor narrative and character explanation, but you managed to work in a good deal of setting and emotional imagery as well. You maintain a pretty clear awareness of the arena and its effects on Jericho, but often get lost in the narrative.
Kyros: You describe the void through which you are transported very vividly, and you give a very vivid and visual description of the arena upon entering it; perhaps too much so. You showed the effect of the chaos around Kryos well, and your description of the first opponent you saw was appropriately frightening, and very vivid. Beyond that you really just tried to put too much into your posts, and that detracted from the good parts.
Pacing: 9.25 – 8.5 / 15
Jericho: You’ve got a fairly steady pace in your narration, but that fluctuates when you reach dialogue. Although it was interesting to see the exchanged words from Jericho’s perspective, the backtracking wasn’t necessary and slowed the pacing. Once you get into the arena, your pacing slows more until you actually get involved in the fight.
Kyros: The language you used in your intro post was very eloquent, but much thicker than usual. Your second post was significantly less thick, and a lot easier to read. You picked up your second post at a good point, and didn’t backtrack too much. You give an exceptionally vivid description of the effects of the ‘fog’ on Kryos, but during it there are still several points that are too wordy. All in all, you should look back over your posts and get rid of any phrases that don’t directly contribute to the thread; try not to repeat yourself in different wording.
Character: 24.75 – 23.25 / 35
Dialogue: 7.25 – 6.75 / 10
Jericho: The dialogue you employ is appropriate. The conversation between Jericho and Kyros about that memory explained a lot about both of them, and the dynamic by which they interact. Understandably, after they part ways there’s no more dialogue except for your internal monologue.
Kyros: Kryos’ dialogue seems too thick to be naturally spoken. The dialogue between you and your partner was good, though, and highlighted the mindsets of each of you. It may be in Kryos’ character to speak that way, but I can’t imagine him doing it very well.
Action: 10 – 9.75 / 15
Jericho: Your attempt to escape the fiery cage was very realistic. You milked the suspense just before you fired the stone at Honouse, and the very last line simply stating that he batted it away brought some real disappointment. The last-minute confirmation of the presence of the One really wrapped up the fight well, and I thought it was an excellent way to end it. There wasn’t a lot of action with your character, but the point is what action there was you played very realistically.
Kyros: You give a very good description of Jericho’s power, and its effect on the plant and animal life around them alike. You repeated yourself a lot in describing the attack your opponent made, however, and though for purposes of thread progression, it is very unrealistic that your character could scale a pile of downed and flaming trees. You never gave me any solid reason to believe he could, you just did it. You play your character very realistically after succumbing to the aging fog, though. Your description of the arcing electrical shrapnel attack highlighted the confused and dazed nature of your character at the time, and Kryos’ last attack before he died was very appropriate, as was his final thought.
Persona: 7.5 – 6.75 / 10
Jericho: Your decision to dwell on the upturned memory exposed when your character and his partner ‘touched minds’ really helped explain his current mental state, and gave a bit more insight into their relationship. You delve into his reasons for being with Kryos, and that helps explain more of his personality, and their relationship. Jericho’s struggle to gain the aid of the One highlighted his troubled state. You describe his fear at seeing Honouse stalking through the night very appropriately, and Jericho’s association of Honouse with his own inner giant brought out the struggle he’d been dealing with since the fight started. You really capture Jericho’s fear near the end well, and all his actions are appropriate and within character.
Kyros: Kryos’ own past seemed to haunt him as well as they travelled to their arena, and this gave some good insight into him. You also highlight the unspoken interactions between your character and his partner. Your character seems to make the best out of his situation, and somehow manages to avoid the despair that might grip a lesser warrior in seeing the behemoth he had to fight. You describe the pain and sensations going through Kryos’ mind as he lay there after being shocked very well, and his thoughts on Jericho’s death showed a little bit of his own philosophy. Working the memory of Lorin into Kryos’ last few moments also highlighted his own internal struggles, but I just didn’t feel convinced he was real; there’s very little emotion in your posts.
Writing Style: 23 – 21 / 30
Technique: 7 – 6.5 / 10
Jericho: It seems to me you tried to mimic Shadowed’s verbose style in your first post. Unfortunately, you really only expounded on unnecessary information, which made it seem more complex, but in fact added little to the thread other than some too-wordy imagery. Your interspersal of short narrative lines in-between dialogue and the redundant nature of some of them kind of drove home the ‘childish’ aspect of the memory in your flashback, though. The fact that you only described the important parts also made it seem more like a memory, rather than a scene. You utilize personification fairly effectively, if a little too often, and you used a lot of onomatopoeias in your third post as well.
Kyros: The wordiness of your first post really brings down the pacing and clarity. Your style can be very heavy with visual imagery, but there’s not a lot of emotional attachment, or mood established. You lapse into purple prose a lot in this thread, and I mean a lot. It was sometimes a struggle just to get through some of your narrative. Seriously consider toning it down, more does not always mean better; it’s how you say it, not how much you say.
Mechanics: 8 – 7.5 / 10
Jericho: I don’t think I noticed many errors except for a predisposition to use onomatopoeias as one-word sentences, and maybe a couple of sentences starting with conjunctions. There were errors, but not many, and I thought you did well here.
Kyros: You seem to use a lot of incomplete sentences, and sentences starting with conjunctions. Though the effects of those are obvious, there are more grammatically correct ways of achieving the same effect. Also, given the large nature of some of your posts, there were a number of typos. These didn’t grow too numerous, though, so you didn’t do too bad in this category.
Clarity: 8 – 7 / 10
Jericho: After your first post, you became a lot more casual with your writing, which lends itself to ease of understanding. I rarely had trouble figuring out what you meant, or why you use some particular wording.
Kyros: Due to the large and complex nature of your posts there are many points where clarity becomes an issue. There are a number of typos or small mistakes that add up to a fair bit after two or three massive posts, as well.
Wildcard: 6 – 4.5
Total: 73.75 – 68.25 / 100
Jericho receives...
500 EXP and 450 GP!
Kyros receives...
1,100 EXP and 400 GP!
The Whole Glory is Victorious!