Condensed judgments would be my preference but we would need to make sure we weren't clogging up the judgment queue. Especially as some judges would be competing!
Condensed judgments would be my preference but we would need to make sure we weren't clogging up the judgment queue. Especially as some judges would be competing!
Althanas Operations Administrator
"When we were young, was this the dream we had? We're celebrating nothing. We need to find our way back."
Ive been behind this since we named it.
There is a darkness in you. In all of us, probably. Beasts we keep chained. Ordinary men have to keep the chains strong, for if we let the beast loose then society will turn upon us with fiery vengeance. Kings though...well, who is there to turn upon them? So the chains are made of straw. It is the curse of kings, Helikaon, that they can become monsters. And they invariably do.
Rayleigh is pretty chill. ♥
If you're doing the judgments, I'd leave the amount of feedback entirely up to you. In the interest of your sanity, I'd recommend no judgments with limited feedback as you've discussed, perhaps adding more feedback as it goes along.
Spectacularly awesome and incredibly terrible wildcard idea: "The Round of Jacks" - players can only type submissions with one hand.
Yeah, most of the entry cost is to cover the judgments. If we do no judgments, 100% of the entry can go toward the final prize.
How exactly would you police that?Originally Posted by Storm Veritas
Althanas Operations Administrator
"When we were young, was this the dream we had? We're celebrating nothing. We need to find our way back."
The question is really what exactly is happening with the other hand?
Althanas Operations Administrator
"When we were young, was this the dream we had? We're celebrating nothing. We need to find our way back."
I tried that once. The staff had a fit.
Althanas Operations Administrator
Dirks GP amount: 2949
Posting Permissions
Submit Thread for Judgment
Reply With Quote